'Critique of Research Article Essay Essay\r'

'The get of this essay is to recognize specific aspects of the clinical nursing interrogation paper through by Carlee Lehna and Jack McNeil. I get out define and debate these aspects. In clinical research articles thither are publications polish ups that give background information as to the bother and research that was performed in the guide, and why this problem needed to be canvas (Burnes & Grove, 2011).\r\nThe literature review in this particular exact pardons to the ratifier nigh the contrast in wellness literacy of English verbalise only parents and Spanish let outing only parents and what tools the researchers utilize to st superstars throw the parents’ health literacy of their child’s health care. The review was very thorough and understandable. The authors named a pair of antithetical tools and how those tools measured literacy. They also explain why they chose the Test of Functional wellness Literacy in Adults tool (TOFHLA), it was the only foot race that was available in English and Spanish.\r\n after(prenominal) reading another article there is another prove called Newest Vital Sign. This test is also in English and Spanish takes less time and has only sixer questions. (Cornett, 2009). Using one test to measure their healt literacy is a limitation. The problem statement helps the reader identify the dilemma for the mastermind universe in the research and why it involve further exploration. Burns & McNeil discuss that the haplesser health literacy of the parents the scant(p)er outcomes of their children (Lehna & McNeil, 2008). The figure of this study is to measure the difference in health literacy in two hosts of different manner of speak speaking parents, i.\r\ne. English and Spanish (Lehna & McNeil, 2008). The relationship between the problem statement and knocking statement is that the finding statement is the how the authors are going to find the fix for the problem. The problem st atement in this article very clear that the low health literacy is directly related to poor outcomes. The purpose statement is concise and hands-down to comprehend. In the Lehna & McNeil article, the word purpose is mentioned several times and it may perk up it harder for the reader to decipher the purpose statement, this is a limitation.\r\nTarget population is a large total try on group that meets a criteria (Burnes & Grove, 2011). Sample is the particular group that participated in the study (Burnes & Grove, 2011). The target group in this particular study meet the criteria of parents/caregivers that either only speak English or Spanish and that their children were inured at Shriners Hospital for Children in Galveston, Texas. The sample group is much smaller, they meet the criteria and participated in the tests, interviews and focus groups.\r\nThese different ways that the researchers used to gather information is a strength. two of the limitations with the samp le is that they only studied parents from one hospital and the authors just specified the language as Spanish, there are numerous different dialects in those Spanish speaking countries that some information could be woolly-headed in translation. The five parts of the study were very easy to recognize. By dissecting this study it helped me identify and learn those 5 parts. I feel a bit to a greater extent comfortable in reading research papers.\r\nThis research study was very arouse because I can relate to the worry with trying to explain health issues with Spanish speaking families. References Burnes, N. , & Grove, S. K. (2011). Understanding nursing Research: Building an Evidence-Based Practice (5th Ed. ). medico Heights, MO: Elsevier. Cornett, S. (2009, Sept 30). Assessing and Addressing wellness Literacy. The Online daybook of Issues in Nursing, 14. http://dx. doi. org/10. 3912/OJIN. Vol14No03Man02 Lehna, C. , & McNeil, J. (2008, April 2). Mixed-Method Exploration of Parents’ Health Understanding. Clinical Nursing Research, http://cnr. sagepub. com/\r\n'